Considering Using Narrow Networks: 3 Steps to Containing Healthcare Costs 

Organizations should consider the use of narrow networks in containing their healthcare costs | Corporate Synergies
There’s a shift from narrow networks that just focus on containing healthcare costs to networks that focus on value-based care. And that’s a good thing.

Historically, healthcare networks have been limited, or narrowed, for the purpose of containing healthcare costs. Employers and carriers are now shifting to developing smaller networks that focus more on value-based healthcare. These networks are made up of providers that offer service at a reasonable cost that’s well-coordinated and results in fewer readmissions, focuses on prevention and takes a conservative approach to care. Narrow networks often don’t just involve primary care physicians, but typically include specialists, such as surgeons, and surgical facilities and hospitals. 

If this sounds complicated, it is. These steps should help you get a good grasp on narrow networks. 

Step 1: Build the Provider List 

Employers and carriers review qualitative elements to measure cost efficiency and high-quality outcomes (what those specific elements are will vary by network). Some value-based networks are built around hospitals that provide exemplary service. However, not every hospital, surgical center or individual provider excels at all the services they provide. For example, a hospital may excel at maternity care, but not at joint replacement surgery. 

Most employers rely on carriers to build narrow networks

That’s because carriers have access to necessary data. Carriers review data across providers to determine which ones meet certain criteria centered around care to patients, zeroing in on those with low cost, low readmission rates, a history of preventive care and patient satisfaction. 

Providers drawn to narrow networks may see an increase in patients, as well as an increase in revenue per patient. In addition, some narrow networks may offer providers incentives to treat patients within the network. 

This leaves the plan sponsor to focus on the equally important issue of employee education and engagement when implementing a narrow network. 

Step 2: Build an Employee Education & Communications Program 

Narrow networks that promise a higher quality of care with a lower cost are enticing to employers and carriers but may be a harder sell to employees. Yes, these networks are likely more cost-effective for employees, too, but the notion of having a smaller list of doctors to choose from can be disappointing, especially for plan participants whose preferred providers are no longer in-network. 

The requirement that an employee change providers can often lead to decision paralysis, and even resentment. They may not know how to choose a new physician, or they may have used one primary care physician for several years and don’t want to change. However, providing information on the “why” of a narrow network can help overcome indecision. And in this age of spiraling healthcare costs, employees are also motivated by potential healthcare savings. 

Transparency is another way to gain employee buy-in, increase appropriate healthcare utilization and generally keep them “on board.” An employee education & communications campaign can explain, among other network details, how providers are selected. Plan participants are likely to be receptive to the idea that a high-quality provider can keep them and their family members out of the hospital, a win for everyone. 

Step 3: Build on Employee Engagement 

Making sure employees understand how it works is key to the network operating correctly. Carrier-driven narrow networks often include tools that allow employees to search for in-network providers and read ratings and reviews so that they can find the highest-quality care. An employee advocacy team can be instrumental in connecting participants with new providers and helping them navigate these networks. 

There’s evidence that narrow networks work. Studies of narrow networks have found that they do result in lower premiums and lower costs to insurers. Several factors on both the patient behavior side and the economic side contribute to this. The selective nature of narrow networks allows insurers to negotiate lower prices, and the plan design steers patients to lower cost providers.1

Containing healthcare costs comes at a price. It’s impossible for employers to continue offering the same provider options without seeing steep increases. But narrow networks could help them and employees save significantly. 

1 Health Economics, “Why Do Narrow Network Plans Cost Less?”
Travis Turner is an expert in the mid-sized employer market, fully insured and self-insured funding arrangements and various lines of health and welfare coverage to provide optimal employee benefit solutions. He is Vice President of Account Management for Corporate Synergies.

Share

Related Content

Latest Content

Want More?

On Demand Webinars​

View any of our past recorded webinars. Note that the recorded webinars are not eligible for CE credits.

Current Events Calendar ​

Learn from respected experts while you earn CE credits for select continuing education events, free of charge.​

Further Learning​

Never miss another event! Receive email alerts for upcoming events and service offerings.​

LIKE WHAT YOU'RE READING?

Get Notified!

We will send important benefits-industry information directly to your inbox as it becomes available, including accredited CE events.

Matt McCuen

National Executive at Imagine360

Matt McCuen is an industry veteran, with over 30 years of experience in the self-funded space.  

As the National Marketing Executive for Imagine360, Matt works with self-funded employers across the nation to improve the benefits they offer to their employees and families. 

Imagine360 is the leading provider of employer-sponsored health plan solutions that deliver deep cost savings and concierge member support. Leveraging 50+ years of expertise, Imagine360’s solutions combine the financial benefits of reference-based pricing, best-in-class member support, and health plan administration.  

Greg Santulli

CEO of Rx Valet

Greg Santulli is the CEO and Co-Founder of Rx Valet, an industry leading Pharmacy Cost Savings company. Greg has over 30 years of experience in healthcare and pharmacy. His leadership has positioned Rx Valet as the one of the leading providers of Pharmacy Cost Containment, low-cost access to medications and a successful pharmacy benefit manager. His company’s approach is to engage all parties involved to provide unprecedented results. 

Mitch Lamoriello

VP Wealth Advisor at Advus Partners

Mitchell has innovation in his bones. He understands the unique challenges and circumstances clients face in their financial lives, and is passionate about discovering new ways his family firm can help serve a changing investor and investment marketplace.

As an investment specialist, Mitchell sits on the Advus’ investment committee. He also is responsible for assisting in the firm’s qualitative and quantitative due diligence process and contributing to the research on capital markets and global economic conditions. His knowledge base in investments provides him with a strong foundation to help answer client questions and navigate issues with their portfolio. As he spends more time with clients, Mitchell understands the importance of achieving goals and has expanded his knowledge, skills and approach beyond investments to encompass holistic financial planning.

andy rhea

Andy Rhea

President of Align Risk Solutions

Andy is the President of Align Risk Solutions. Prior to the formation of Align, Andy served as General Counsel to the Captive Insurance Division for the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance. He began his legal career with the Mississippi Insurance Department and in private practice. He is a licensed attorney (in both Tennessee and Mississippi) and holds the Associate in Captive Insurance designation. Andy is very active in various captive insurance associations, currently serving as the President of the Tennessee Captive Insurance Association. Andy is a graduate of Mississippi State University where he received a BBA and MBA, and he earned his law degree from the University of Mississippi. During the feasibility and formation phases of Align’s process, Andy is involved in all regulatory, business plan and application functions. Ongoing, Andy is responsible for corporate governance, regulatory matters, and client relationships. 

Andrew Zito

President/CEO – Advus Fincancial Partners

Andrew has always been fascinated by complex things. The more complicated something is, the more he wants to understand it and fix it. From applying technology to solve business problems to working with plan sponsors to untangle complicated situations, he thrives on finding efficient and effective solutions.

Andrew oversees the operations of Advus, translating the firm’s vision and objectives into actionable processes. His responsibilities encompass technology solutions, business processes, service standards and human resources. He also is directly responsible for the retirement plan division and settingits strategic direction.

Andrew specializes in the qualified retirement plan aspect of the Advus business. Throughout his career, he has worked with retirement plans in a variety of different capacities. He began his career as an intern at Advus (formerly LAMCO Advisory Services, Inc.) assisting with compliance testing. He then spent several years working on platform conversions for retirement plans before moving into his present consulting role. Within the retirement plan space, he specializes in complex plan situations including plan mergers, spinoffs, complex regulatory audits, M&A activity and error corrections.